<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for </title>
	<atom:link href="http://lockpickersmall.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lockpickersmall.wordpress.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 12:36:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Cut-Away Practice Lock, or Standard? by Spence</title>
		<link>http://lockpickersmall.wordpress.com/2008/04/30/cut-away-practice-lock-or-standard/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Spence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 12:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lockpickersmall.wordpress.com/?p=8#comment-9</guid>
		<description>I cutaway high security cylinders all the time. I&#039;ve just finished cutting an MTL MT5+ which is possibly non existant anywhere else at the moment, well exclusive!

When you done the write up, you neglected to give the other side of cutaways...... people collect them. It&#039;s not always for picking, and I find 90% of my customers just collect and enjoy seeing what is going on inside. I also find the higher the security, or the more seperate locking mechanisms, the more interest they fetch.

I cut my locks in a way that keeps the lock fully functional &amp; feeling exactly as it did in standard form. You can see the upper and lower pins in full also :)

http://img37.imageshack.us/img37/4411/cimg6182.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cutaway high security cylinders all the time. I&#8217;ve just finished cutting an MTL MT5+ which is possibly non existant anywhere else at the moment, well exclusive!</p>
<p>When you done the write up, you neglected to give the other side of cutaways&#8230;&#8230; people collect them. It&#8217;s not always for picking, and I find 90% of my customers just collect and enjoy seeing what is going on inside. I also find the higher the security, or the more seperate locking mechanisms, the more interest they fetch.</p>
<p>I cut my locks in a way that keeps the lock fully functional &amp; feeling exactly as it did in standard form. You can see the upper and lower pins in full also <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><a href="http://img37.imageshack.us/img37/4411/cimg6182.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://img37.imageshack.us/img37/4411/cimg6182.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cut-Away Practice Lock, or Standard? by lockpickersmall</title>
		<link>http://lockpickersmall.wordpress.com/2008/04/30/cut-away-practice-lock-or-standard/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>lockpickersmall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 22:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lockpickersmall.wordpress.com/?p=8#comment-3</guid>
		<description>I have to be honest, Alven, I have never tried to pick one of those locks but I know which ones you&#039;re referring to.  We&#039;re considering carrying them simply because they are designed in a different way than the ones we produce and this will give our customers more variety to choose from.  All I can tell you for certain is that the key in knob cylinders we use to create our cut-aways are of very high quality with close tolerances, and though quite a bit of material has been removed to give a view of the top pins there is still enough left that it doesn&#039;t much affect the &#039;feedback&#039; that a lock picker gets when he is working on a lock.  This feedback, or feel, is something you develop over time, picking many many locks.

George Robertson, admin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to be honest, Alven, I have never tried to pick one of those locks but I know which ones you&#8217;re referring to.  We&#8217;re considering carrying them simply because they are designed in a different way than the ones we produce and this will give our customers more variety to choose from.  All I can tell you for certain is that the key in knob cylinders we use to create our cut-aways are of very high quality with close tolerances, and though quite a bit of material has been removed to give a view of the top pins there is still enough left that it doesn&#8217;t much affect the &#8216;feedback&#8217; that a lock picker gets when he is working on a lock.  This feedback, or feel, is something you develop over time, picking many many locks.</p>
<p>George Robertson, admin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cut-Away Practice Lock, or Standard? by Alven</title>
		<link>http://lockpickersmall.wordpress.com/2008/04/30/cut-away-practice-lock-or-standard/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Alven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 23:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lockpickersmall.wordpress.com/?p=8#comment-2</guid>
		<description>I have one of those plastic see-through locks that I bought a year or so ago and it just doesn&#039;t seem to work like a real lock would.  I can pick it too easy.  Do your cut away locks work better than these?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have one of those plastic see-through locks that I bought a year or so ago and it just doesn&#8217;t seem to work like a real lock would.  I can pick it too easy.  Do your cut away locks work better than these?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
